|
HomePhilosophy
Biography
Contact
|
|
Comparison of Dispute Resolution Options
|
|
Mediation
|
Collaborative Law
|
Arbitration
|
Litigation
|
|
Cost
|
Lowest. Mediation services (and its large group
cousin, facilitation), can cost as little as a few hundred dollars,
although in the low four figures is more realistic. Great way to keep
the decision-making in your hands by avoiding litigation or arbitration.
|
Higher, because in collaborative law, you have two lawyers involved in the entire process, rather just one in mediation. A great way to keep the decision making in your hands by avoiding arbitration and mediation.
|
Substantially higher – maybe even higher
than the litigation process in court because in addition to discovery,
motions and a trial, you are paying out of pocket for the judge. But
the parties, or arbitrator, can issue rules to limit the expenses.
|
Usually very expensive. Litigation and litigation
support can cost multiples of thousands of dollars. There are few cost
controls when it comes to a litigation trial.
|
|
Time for Resolution
|
Quickest form of alternative
dispute resolution - sometimes takes only a few hours.
|
Slower
- usually several meetings of all the lawyers and clients
together, sometimes may include experts.
|
You set the schedule with the private
judge (the “arbitrator”), but with briefs, discovery
and a trial, legal arbitration can be lengthy. Usually appeals
are not available.
|
Can
be years. First discovery must be completed, motions filed,
heard and decided, then a judge must be available to hear
and decide the case, and then possible appeals.
|
|
Types of Cases for which process is most appropriate
|
Any matter in which the parties are willing
to listen to the other side (directly or through the mediator)
and are willing to negotiate in good faith. Cases where
there is a significant imbalance between the parties (e.g.
one party is at a significant educational or psychological
dis-advantage) may not be appropriate for mediation.
|
Cases
where the parties want to bargain in good faith, but one
or both feel more comfortable negotiating with their lawyer
by their side.
|
All cases except for child custody and
support (although arbitrator can issue advisory opinions
in those type cases).
|
Where
the parties cannot negotiate, there is a significant power
imbalance or abuse, or where a precedential decision is
important, perhaps by appeals.
|
|
Confidentiality
|
All documents prepared for the mediation,
and all matters discussed in the mediation, are confidential.
Only the final agreement, if submitted to the court, is
a public document.
|
All
documents prepared for the collaborative negotiations, and
all matters discussed in the sessions, are confidential.
Only the final agreement, if submitted to the court, is
a public document.
|
Depends upon the rules the parties establish.
At a minimum, if the arbitrator’s decision is filed
with the court for registering or enforcement, it will be
available for public inspection.
|
Generally
all pleading, attachments and judicial decisions are open
to the public, although parties can request that certain
medical, financial or child information be kept private.
This is the least private of the processes.
|
|
Decision-maker
|
You and the other party.
|
You
and the other party.
|
The arbitrator.
|
The judge.
|
|
Outcome
|
Mediator prepares a Memorandum of Understanding or Settlement
Agreement, which when signed becomes a binding contract, and may be enforceable
by a court.
|
The collaborative lawyers prepare a Settlement Agreement,
which when signed becomes a binding contract, and may be enforceable by a
court.
|
Arbitrator issues a final decision, which generally cannot be
appealed.
|
Judge issues a final decision, which can be appealed.
|
Back to ADR Page
|
|
|
|